Passage 1 小說類
Passage 2 社科類
Passage 3 科學類
《亞太考區》的第三篇科學文章關於(Gold in trees may hint at buried treasure)，與北美一樣同屬「實驗結論類」文章，文章結構簡單和觀點清晰，算是較為簡單的文章題材。
Passage 4 歷史類
第二篇文章作者是Booker Washington的演講，盛讚林肯是emancipator，benefactor of all，主要argument是林肯解放了黑奴，也讓白人自食其力，促進了經濟的發展。
Passage 5 科學類(雙篇)
《亞太考區》亞太考區則是關於海底地貌的選材，難度和北美差不多。海底地貌（Hills等）形成主要原因，以前理論核心是板塊運動（斷層fault）導致了這些地貌的形成。新理論是火山所致，火山又跟地球的軌道有關，軌道運動會引起潮汐海平面的變化，引起海地壓力變化導致火山。又因為地球的ice ages與軌道有關，所以現在的海地地貌能提示ice age。
此外，本次考試閱讀部分進行了加試，考察了雙篇科學，主要探討關於原始火星，其實是wet not warm 的假設。
《北美考區》隨著數位相機的普及化，先前的拍照技術漸漸失傳。文章主要介紹目前某些攝影家依然會用wet plate photography，討論了這項技術的原理和利弊。
文章來源：Lighten up, Sir David. Our wildlife is safe
Prompt: How does Matt Ridley build on his argument that human population do not have adverse effect on the natural environment in the future?
Lighten up, Sir David. Our wildlife is safe
By Matt Ridley Sep. 12, 2013, The Times
- Publicising his imminent new series about the evolution of animals, Sir David Attenborough said in an interview this week that he thought a reduction in human population during this century is impossible and “we’re lucky to be living when we are, because things are going to get worse”. People will look back in another 100 years “at a world that was less crowded, full of natural wonders, and healthier”.
- His is a common view and one I used to share. He longs for people to enjoy the open spaces and abundant herds of game that he has been fortunate enough to see. To that end he thinks it vital that there should be fewer of us.
- Ever so politely, I would now passionately disagree with the two premises of his argument. It’s actually quite likely, rather than impossible, that population will be falling by the end of this century and it is also quite likely that the people alive then will have lots more wilderness to explore and wildlife to admire than today.
- The rate at which world population grows has roughly halved from more than 2 per cent a year in the 1960s to roughly 1 per cent a year now. Even the total number of people added to the annual population has been dropping for nearly 30 years. If those declines continue, they will hit zero in about 2070 — not much more than 50 years from now. In recent decades the birth rate has fallen in every part of the world. Fertility in Bangladesh has fallen from nearly 7 children per woman in the 1960s to just over 2 today; Kenya from 8 to 4.5; Brazil 5.7 to 1.8; Iran 6.8 to 1.9; Ireland 3.9 to 2…
- Europe, Asia and Latin America have already gone through this transition and most countries are producing babies at or below replacement rate of 2.2 per woman, at which population stabilises (without immigration). Africa, for so long written off as a special (basket) case, is following suit almost exactly. For this reason alone, I suspect the world population will stop growing and begin to shrink even earlier than 2070 and almost certainly within this century. But even if it does not, there is good reason to reassure Sir David that our great grandchildren will have more wildlife to look at than he has had.
- An ingenious study by scientists at Rockefeller University in New York has recently calculated that even with population continuing to grow, and even with people eating more food and especially more meat, we have almost certainly already passed “peak farmland”, because of the rate at which fertilisers are improving yields. (Or we would have done if not for biofuels projects.) We will feed nine or ten billion people in 2070 from a considerably smaller acreage than we need to feed seven billion today.
- Land sparing is already occurring on a grand scale. Forest cover is increasing in many parts of the world, from Scotland to Bangladesh. Wildlife populations are booming in Europe (deer, bears, boar, otters), in the polar regions (walrus, seals, penguins, whales) and North America (turkeys, coyotes, bison, geese) and this is happening fastest in the richest countries. According to one recent report, animal populations grew by 6 per cent in Europe, North America and Northern Asia between 1970 and 2012, while shrinking in tropical regions. There is almost a perfect correlation between the severity of conservation problems and poverty, because the richer people get, the less they try to live off the land and compete with nature — the less they seek bushmeat and charcoal from the forest.
- Once again, Africa may spring a pleasant surprise. Over the past four decades agricultural yields in Africa hardly budged while they doubled or quadrupled in most of Asia. That is almost entirely down to a dearth of fertiliser and it is beginning to change. If African yields were to rise, the acreage devoted to farmland globally would start to fall even faster, releasing more and more land for “re-wilding”. The great herds and flocks that so delight Sir David would reassemble in more and more places. The happy conclusion is that making people better off and making nature better off are not in opposition; they go hand in hand.